A cleaner BPL, but plenty of room for improvement

The 2015 BPL might not have made for the most entertaining watch, but with fewer controversies than past editions and no payment hassles, the future bodes well for the tournament

Mohammad Isam20-Dec-2015If the goal was just to avoid past mistakes, the BPL’s third edition was a success. However, Bangladesh’s domestic T20 tournament should be about a lot more than just paying the players on time.If you enjoy watching the ball dominate over the bat, the BPL would have made for fun viewing. The tired and soft pitches at the Shere Bangla National Stadium in Mirpur, where 26 out of the tournament’s 34 matches were held, constricted most of the strokeplay but players like Kumar Sangakkara, Tamim Iqbal and Mahmudullah rode out difficult periods and thrived on several occasions. Attackers like Lendl Simmons and Tillakaratne Dilshan underwhelmed by failing to adjust to the conditions, while Marlon Samuels, Imrul Kayes and Jahurul Islam changed their ways and batted with renewed purpose.The bowlers were not given the advantage by design, but made the most of the conditions. Four of the top five wicket-takers were seamers. Rookie Abu Hider and the steady Al-Amin Hossain went toe-to-toe with seasoned T20 performers like Kevon Cooper and Thisara Perera. In the last two BPLs, three of the top five wicket-takers were spinners. This time, it was Shakib Al Hasan who was the lone spinner in that list.Also heartening to see – and there were not many aspects like that in the 2012 and 2013 tournaments – was Bangladeshi batsmen who had been considered has-beens, showing a lot of fight. Alok Kapali was the hero of the final, Rangpur Riders relied much on Jahurul Islam, and Shahriar Nafees showed glimpses of the player he was back in 2006.The BPL was held in November-December to help the Bangladesh players prepare for the Asia Cup and World T20. Soumya Sarkar and Nasir Hossain struggled, but Sabbir Rahman’s return to form, and the smoothness of Tamim and Imrul Kayes will no doubt boost the team come March.Even for a few of the overseas players, the BPL was worth the effort. Comeback kid Mohammad Amir is back in the reckoning for Pakistan, while journeyman Ashar Zaidi will be hoping to get a big deal at the Pakistan Super League. The BPL was held in the backdrop of two series being postponed due to terrorism threats, and the fact that 65 players and six high-profile coaches felt safe enough to travel to and play in Bangladesh has also made the BCB happy.Nazmul Hassan, the BCB president, said Bangladesh were mindful of not repeating previous errors, and felt that the timely payment of players’ fees was a major accomplishment.A jubilant Comilla Victorians side celebrate their BPL title triumph•BCB”We were very careful when holding the third BPL of not repeating the old problems,” Hassan said. “During this year’s tournament, we haven’t heard of anything like it had happened in the last two seasons. This was a much more disciplined tournament. Teams have made timely payments.”Comilla Victorians and Chittagong Vikings made 100% payments to all their players; Rangpur Riders paid their foreign cricketers 100% and 75% to their local players; Barisal Bulls, Dhaka Dynamites and Sylhet Super Stars have paid 75% of their payments. None of the teams are behind the schedule. It is a success, since there were no complaints or problems about payment.”Hassan said he wanted to see an additional franchise and venue for next season, and jokingly described the BPL as a “pain” given how the 2013 edition was mired in controversies.”It wasn’t an easy decision to leave out some of the franchises. The BPL was a painful event when I took over at the BCB. The franchises used to commit to us repeatedly that they would pay, but didn’t give us the money. We had to manage so many of such things. There was fear of match-fixing and players’ payment.”Our goal this time was to have the best possible cricket. I think we could complete this BPL without any major problems. I hope we can hold on to this system in the next BPL.”The system that Hassan is talking about should ensure proper paperwork for players’ No-Objection Certificates, and ensuring that the board outlines more discipline among the franchises. The BCB had warned the Dhaka franchise owner for rushing into the Mirpur stadium’s premises with more than a thousand people, but their disciplinary committee has not yet submitted the report regarding Tamim’s allegations from the Sylhet-Chittagong game.Hassan said the BCB earned Tk 25 crore (approx USD 3.2 million) and while the BPL was not a rousing success, it was also not a run-of-the-mill T20 tournament. It was a competition where bowlers made the batsmen hop around, but the batsmen also made their presence felt by staging dramatic fight-backs.

Afghanistan look to take the next step up

After storming through the qualifiers, Afghanistan may well fancy themselves to spring an upset or two in the Super 10s

Karthik Krishnaswamy16-Mar-2016Hamid Hassan swerves one through Kumar Sangakkara’s defences. He does a cartwheel of sorts. Chasing 233, an anxious, wobbly Sri Lanka line-up is 18 for 3 against a fired-up Afghanistan pace attack.A year and a month on from that scare in Dunedin, another potentially anxious and wobbly Sri Lanka line-up will take on Afghanistan at another world event. This time, they will not have Sangakkara. They will not even have Mahela Jayawardene, whose 120-ball 100 dragged the team to an eventual four-wicket win on that tumultuous day.Sri Lanka will have a new T20 captain, who has admitted he was not mentally prepared to take on the role, but could not say no to his board. His board approached him because their regular T20 captain and pace spearhead is battling a troublesome left knee that has kept him out of a number of games recently, and could keep him out of their World T20 clash against Afghanistan.Sri Lanka have a newly – and hastily – appointed selection committee, and a squad that underwent two last-minute changes: two experienced players replaced two players who made their T20I debuts in the last eight months. Despite that, their squad still contains four players who made their international debuts, in any format, only last year.Sri Lanka have won only one of their last six T20I matches. That win came against UAE, after a less-than-convincing performance.Afghanistan will look at all this and tell themselves they can take down Sri Lanka. Not just scare them, but actually go ahead and beat them.Afghanistan have reached the Super 10s with three wins in three first-round matches. They have a 16-3 T20I record since January 2015, but have not faced a Full Member apart from Zimbabwe in that period. Here, now, is their chance. They will believe they can beat Sri Lanka, and will not count themselves out against South Africa, England and West Indies either.”I think they will beat one or two teams, definitely,” Hamilton Masakadza said, after Afghanistan knocked his side out of the tournament. “They are a little bit better suited to Asian conditions than the other guys, and on their day they can really pull out a good game. So I think, just looking at the rest of the tournament, they could pull out a surprise or two.”By Asian conditions, Masakadza probably meant conditions akin to the slow, low pitches that Afghanistan played all their matches on during their first round in Nagpur. In those three matches, their four main spinners – Rashid Khan, Samiullah Shenwari, Mohammad Nabi and Amir Hamza – picked up 14 wickets at an average of 14.93, while conceding only 5.81 runs per over.Despite the presence of Hamid and Dawlat Zadran in their line-up, Afghanistan’s modus operandi was rather different to their pace-centric approach during last year’s ODI World Cup, but one that was perfectly tailored to the conditions they encountered. Despite the superior opposition they will face in the Super 10s, similar pitches could allow Afghanistan to keep competing hard.Afghanistan’s Super 10 meetings will pit them against Sri Lanka in Kolkata, South Africa in Mumbai, England in Delhi and West Indies back in Nagpur, where conditions are unlikely to change drastically between now and March 27.Given that the other three venues have only hosted one T20I each before this tournament, it makes sense to dip into their ODI records to get an idea of the conditions they could provide. Among Indian grounds that have hosted five or more ODIs since the start of this decade, Eden Gardens and the Feroz Shah Kotla are the only two where spinners collectively average under 30, have strike rates below 40, and economy rates below five an over. Afghanistan should travel to Kolkata and Delhi with a certain sense of anticipation. The Wankhede, which generally offers more pace and bounce, will probably provide Afghanistan’s batsmen their only real test of technique, against a pacy South African attack.Even otherwise, batting is Afghanistan’s weaker suit – potentially explosive but also prone to collapses. They have tried to counter this by packing their side with batsmen, and as a result Shenwari, a batting allrounder, and Najibullah Zadran, a specialist batsman, have batted only once each in their three first-round matches. Having that insurance down the order has meant weakening the bowling attack: the left-arm quick Shapoor Zadran is yet to play a game and the left-arm spinner Hamza has featured only once.It is a compromise, but it has paid off till now. The batting depth allowed Afghanistan a degree of breathing room even when they slipped to 63 for 4 against Zimbabwe. Their captain Asghar Stanikzai said he knew there were batsmen to come even if Nabi or Shenwari – who put on a match-winning stand of 98 – had been dismissed cheaply. “No, [I wasn’t worried],” he said. “We played nine batsmen.”It may not work nearly as well against stronger teams, who will look to put pressure on the likes of Nabi, Shenwari and the medium-pacer Gulbadin Naib, who floats somewhere between the categories of part-timer and genuine allrounder. They will also come a lot harder at the top order than Scotland, Hong Kong or Zimbabwe did.But Afghanistan know all this and will be prepared. The pressure of getting through a qualifier is off them, and they might play with even more freedom than they normally do, if that’s even possible. They will have nothing to lose.

Duminy, South Africa's Graeme Hick?

Touted as the next big thing after his spectacular Test entry, JP Duminy hasn’t consistently delivered against top-quality opposition

Willem Swart18-Feb-2016December 2008, JP Duminy scored a masterful 166 runs against the then No. 1 side in the world, Australia, in only his third Test innings, batting with the tail. South Africa won the Test and their first series victory in Australian. JP Duminy became a star, and everyone hailed the future king of batting.On 11 October 2009, former Australian captain Ian Chappell referred to him as a great in the making with comparisons to Ricky Ponting. Unfortunately, this may just be the second big punt in recent cricket history that has ended up as just that, a punt.On Sunday 14th February 2016 South Africa came back from 2-0 down to win the ODI series against England 3-2 with a comprehensive victory against England at Newlands, Cape Town.Omitted from South Africa’s starting XI was JP Duminy, a veteran of 150 ODI matches for his country, left out from the team in the crunch match of the series, on his home ground.On first impression one might believe JP’s omission was due to his recent poor run of form, and the fact that he was involved in the unfortunate run-out of captain AB De Villiers in the fourth ODI at Johannesburg.However, it may also just be the last nail in the coffin that has been forced in, oh so gentle over a prolonged period of sub-par performances.During JP’s career, the odd flash of style and brilliance has been overshadowed by plenty of failures at the highest level. A career that imitates the frustration and sad truth of England’s troubled genius, Graeme Hick. Both players were given ample opportunity to play for their country, both players failed to consistently produce or live up to the expectations. A comparison between their first-class and Test records reflect an interesting reality. Both players have a Test average in the low thirties, while both averages in the high 50s in all other first-class cricket.

Graeme Hick
Format MAT INNS NO RUNS AVG 100 50 I/100 I/50
Test 65 114 6 3383 31.32 6 18 19 4.75
All Other FC 461 757 78 37729 55.57 130 140 5.82 2.8
JP Duminy
Format MAT INNS NO RUNS AVG 100 50 I/100 I/50
Test 34 53 9 1423 32.34 4 6 13.25 5.3
All Other FC 61 99 17 4646 56.66 14 22 7.07 2.75

Analysing Duminy’s ODI career reflects an average of only 28.60 against the stronger teams in this era (Australia, England, Pakistan, New Zealand, India and Sri Lanka). His average against the weaker sides is 76.50, as tabled below. All four of his ODI hundreds have been against Zimbabwe (3) and the Netherlands.

JP Duminy
Opposition MAT INNS NO RUNS AVG 100 50 I/100 I/50
Major teams 103 95 13 2345 28.6 0 13 7.31
Minor teams 47 40 18 1683 76.5 4 8 10 3.33

Both Hick and Duminy’s international careers have been marred by disappointing performances, being sidelined and recalled again after scoring heavily on the domestic circuits. Both their techniques were found out at the highest level, neither was able to adapt.Every now and then one is blessed to witness a stylish cover drive, a run-a-ball fifty to guide the team to safety.And then the reality steps in when the short-ball is bumped in the air, or the straight one from the slow bowler thumps into the pad, again.And when the days play is over, and the sun has set, the punters are reminiscing on what could have been, why wasn’t it? How could they get it so wrong?Is JP Duminy just another misunderstood enigma, a failed genius, a Graeme Hick, or maybe, just maybe an unfair comparison, an unfair expectation, a wishful punt?Want to be featured on Inbox? Send your articles to us here, with “Inbox” in the subject line.

The men who need to piece Sunrisers' jigsaw

David Warner’s men wouldn’t want to be reminded about their season opener in Bangalore. The form of Shikhar Dhawan, Yuvraj Singh and Bhuvneshwar Kumar will be key to their chances in the finale

Alagappan Muthu in Bangalore28-May-2016It has been said all season that David Warner has carried Sunrisers Hyderabad on his back in 2016. He has 779 runs from 16 innings. 12 of those scores have been 20-plus, and only four times has he stopped before making a fifty. The latest came under the pressure associated with chasing in a knockout game with very little support from his team-mates. The 93 not out against Gujarat Lions took Sunrisers from 84 for 5 in the 13th over to a target of 163 and confirm a place in the IPL final for the first time in their history.But winning a trophy requires “a team effort,” which Warner has attributed to every time they’ve won. It isn’t a question of gelling well. The make-up of the team hasn’t changed much since they made their debut in 2013 and the stories of how well they have handled a homesick, camera shy debutant Mustafizur Rahman point to a nurturing environment.It is a question of raising their games. The bowlers have done that admirably and, along with Warner, have been the reason for Sunrisers making it back to the M Chinnaswamy Stadium, where they were thumped by 45 runs in their season opener. On that occasion, Royal Challengers Bangalore’s batting strength had translated to a total of 227 for 4 and overwhelmed the visitors.For a different result on Sunday, Sunrisers will be hoping their in-form players have one last ride in them and some of their out-of-form players rise to the occasion. Here are three who could be key.Bhuvneshwar KumarHe didn’t have a pleasant time on his last visit to Bangalore. The yorkers went wrong so badly that he could pitch only one of the seven balls – one of the full-tosses was ruled a no-ball – in the 19th over and 18-year old Sarfaraz Khan went on a scooping spree. To Bhuvneshwar’s credit, he has not been discouraged from looking for the blockhole. His pace is up, has reprised his old swing and has been the leader of the attack with 23 wickets in 16 matches at an economy of 7.5. With Ashish Nehra out and Mustafizur under an injury cloud, Bhuvneshwar’s spells at the top and end of the innings will be vital to his team’s chances.Yuvraj SinghHe hadn’t been in Bangalore the last time and it almost seemed like once Warner had been dismissed in the ninth over, the contest was over. Yuvraj’s return from an ankle injury meant oppositions had to keep looking for wickets because of the potential he has to change a game all on his own. In this IPL, especially early in his innings, Yuvraj has not looked particularly fluent. Spin and pace have troubled him, but when he has been able to spend time in the middle, he has shown the skills that made him an outstanding limited-overs batsman – lofting cricket balls out into orbit and rattling the bowler into not being able to execute his plans. Big occasions have brought out the best in Yuvraj before and the Chinnaswamy’s short boundaries will be tempting as well.Shikhar DhawanHe needed time to regain his fluency and Warner’s form allowed him just that. The best representation of Dhawan in form is when he pierces a well-stocked off-side field with his square drives and he has been hitting them a lot more fluently as the tournament has gone on. His legside play has also improved lately, with the flick being among his preferred shots. Sunrisers’ plan has been for one of their top-order batsmen to last the 20 overs and considering the many times his opening partner has done that, Dhawan wouldn’t want to fall too far behind.

Mohit, openers set up Kings XI's six-wicket win

17-Apr-2016Kevin Pietersen shared a 55-run second-wicket stand with Faf du Plessis, but contributed only a run-a-ball 15 before he was dismissed by Kyle Abbott•AFPSupergiants slowed down in the middle overs, before Steven Smith complemented du Plessis superbly, making a 26-ball 38 to push the run rate above 7.50•BCCIA weary du Plessis fought the heat and scored a fifty to take Supergiants towards a competitive total•BCCIMohit Sharma struck with the first ball of the last over, sending du Plessis back with a return catch•AFPIt was the first of three strikes in the final over that included a run-out of Irfan Pathan as Supergiants scored just three runs to finish on 152 for 7. Mohit ended with figures of 3 for 23•BCCIM Vijay began Kings XI’s reply in brisk fashion, but Manan Vohra soon caught up and outscored his partner in an opening stand of 97•BCCIAnkit Sharma, the left-arm spinner, ended the partnership by trapping Vohra leg before for a 33-ball 51 in the 13th over•BCCIVijay was his elegant self as he scored 53 off 49 balls, which included five fours and two sixes•BCCIWhen it looked like Kings XI were cruising, M Ashwin picked up three quick wickets to bring Supergiants back into the contest•BCCIBut Glenn Maxwell blasted 32 off 14 balls to take Kings XI to a six-wicket win with eight balls to spare•AFP

Bavuma's giant leap

The South African batsman talks us through his landmark hundred at Newlands against England, an inspiration to an emerging generation of South African players

Luke Alfred04-Jul-2016When Temba Bavuma was a boy, he was asked where he thought he’d be in 15 years’ time. He thought about it, sat down, and wrote that when he grew up he wanted to become an accountant, play cricket for South Africa and shake the president’s hand – not necessarily in that order.His chutzpah found favour because his answer was included in the pages of that year’s school magazine. “The whole tone of it was quite cocky and arrogant,” he says now.On January 5 this year Bavuma scored a century in the second Test against England, at Newlands, an achievement that trumped, by some margin, his stated three intentions as a Grade 6 pupil at SACS Junior School in Cape Town all those years ago. It was an innings widely but shallowly celebrated, partly because the significance of milestones such as these only becomes clearer with time. Partly, though, it was an event of such magnitude that it was impossible to wrap one’s head around it. This year is the 25th anniversary of South Africa’s readmission to international cricket, and in that time no black cricketer from the country had come close to scoring a Test hundred. The previous best was Monde Zondeki’s cavalier 59 against England at Headingley in 2003.There are many reasons for the conspicuous lack of tonnage, some obvious, some opaque. One is the comparative withdrawal of the development programme initiated by Ali Bacher, both continued and allowed to fall into disrepair under former Cricket South Africa CEO Gerald Majola. Another is the government’s retreat from the township schools and the hand-wringing that invariably accompanies any request for their vision or money. Then there are the intangibles. What barriers, real and imagined, plague black South African batsmen? And without a culture of local batting heroes, how can doubts over spirit and history be erased and overcome?

“‘You are so shit, I don’t know what you are doing here,’ Stokes said to me. If he’d said that earlier, it wouldn’t have made a difference, but after that I just decided I was going to play because it stung a bit”

Despite its world-historical flavour, Bavuma’s innings also owed as much as any other to the magic weave of circumstance. When on 8, he was so pumped up after a sledge from Ben Stokes that his first fifty came in a swift swift blur of 11 fours. His second fifty was more sedate. The scoreboard’s shadow started to weigh him down and, when in his 80s, he was haunted by Stuart Broad, losing both composure and his normally trustworthy sense of where exactly his off stump stood.Bavuma was not feeling good after South Africa’s defeat in the first Test, at Kingsmead. He and Dale Steyn took an early flight out of Durban only hours after the close and his scores of 0 and 10 in the 241-run defeat were still wedged uncomfortably in his head. He sought the sanctuary of his grandmother’s home in the Cape Town township of Langa, and 24 hours later, had friends around for a New Year’s Eve .For all the succour of the township, he was bothered, fearing that he might lose his place in the Test team. In the end, the selectors bravely decided to drop JP Duminy, and Bavuma kept his place, at least for another Test. “I’ve never admitted this, but I was feeling the pressure. I needed to repay their favour. I thought to myself that this could be the end of Temba Bavuma.”Bavuma is a teetotaller and his mates celebrated the arrival of the new year in various states of intoxication. His father made it clear that he thought Bavuma should be celebrating at the South African team hotel. Every time someone brought up the subject of cricket, Bavuma padded it away. South Africa trained the following morning amid the intense, slightly irritable scrutiny that follows disappointment. “The session was hectic because all the selectors were there,” Bavuma says. “Ashwell [Prince] and Hussein Manack were at practice and so was Graeme Smith. They were all throwing their two cents around, if I can say that.”Despite the scrutiny, Bavuma managed to chat with Prince, a player he has always admired. It was less what Prince said than the tone of his words that inspired him. “My confidence was sleeping until I spoke to Ashwell – it awoke something in me,” he says. “I’ve always been able to relate to him. He told me that they’re [England] not world-class and we shouldn’t stand back. That gave me confidence.”A pep talk by selector Ashwell Prince and sledging by Ben Stokes early in the innings galvanised Bavuma•Getty ImagesIf playing for his franchise, Bavuma would normally be batting by lunchtime but Test cricket requires a more careful rationing of energies. At the beginning of South Africa’s chase in reply to England’s 629 for 6, Bavuma slept, but when AB de Villiers was batting he watched the game on television in the dressing room. Sometimes he doesn’t watch the game at all (“I don’t really know why”) although in this case he kept an eye on matters in the middle.It was a long wait, through the third afternoon and well into the fourth morning. Only when Hashim Amla fell for an epic 201 after lunch did Bavuma walk to the crease to join Faf du Plessis The scoreboard clock showed 13:32, and little were the run-sated crowd to know as he scratched out his guard – middle and off to align his head with off-stump, allowing him to leave well – that they were about to witness one of the most important innings in the history of South African cricket.”We’d decided to bat time, that’s what the Test was all about,” Bavuma says. “When Faf went, I felt a bit of pressure, then Quinny [Quinton de Kock] walked in calmly and with a bit of arrogance. When I felt that energy, I knew I could adopt it – I kind of sucked that into my game,” Bavuma says.De Kock didn’t last long, and that brought Bavuma’s domestic team-mate Chris Morris to the middle. Bavuma had by this stage opened his account, with a four off James Anderson, cuffed dismissively on the up through extra cover. “It didn’t swing. I think it was probably my best shot of the day.”His next scoring shot was off Stokes. “With me, the horizontal-bat shots are generally instinctive,” Bavuma says. “When he bowled it short, I hooked the ball to the right of fine leg – it was more of a glide, really, and it went for four. Then I snicked an inside edge down to fine leg for another four, which didn’t please him. ‘You are so shit, I don’t know what you are doing here,’ Stokes said to me after that second four. It’s not the most creative chirp, is it? If he’d said that earlier, it wouldn’t have made a difference, but after that I just decided I was going to play because it stung a bit.”Bavuma had already scored five fours within the first hour of his innings. By his own admission, he was in a bubble. The bother he felt in the days preceding the Test were beginning to fall away; Prince’s pep talk had given him a fillip and Stokes’ sledge had galvanised him.He took three consecutive fours off Steven Finn to hurtle into the 30s, and he and Morris began to settle into a productive partnership. “When Finn came on I saw it as an opportunity to put someone under pressure,” Bavuma says. “His pace was up there but I still felt that I could score, so a pull, a drive and a backward cut later I was in a zone. When Moeen Ali came on, I almost had to restrain myself because I was in an attacking mode and just wanted to go at everything.”

In six seasons between 2004-05 and 2010-11, only six centuries were scored by black batsmen in first-class cricket – two of them by Bavuma

The first week of January is still post-Christmas holiday time in South Africa. When Bavuma came to the crease on the Tuesday, millions of people around the country were lolling around their television screens, or were on holiday at the seaside or simply enjoying a day or two of quiet leisure before returning to work. As Bavuma grew in confidence, and the watching nation sensed something special was in the offing, viewing figures began to climb.His three fours off Finn had taken him to 35, and there he stood stranded as he defended five dot balls from Ali. Morris was unable to score off Finn’s following over but then five off a Moeen over (including a four), two singles from Finn’s next, and dot-dot-four-four-single off Moeen brought up Bavuma’s fifty, scored in 52 balls.Social media and the bush telegraph went to work. “On average, 26% more people watched the day’s play compared to all the other days of Test cricket combined,” says Kelvin Watt of Repucom, a market research agency that provides stats to CSA and other sporting federations. “The other thing that’s significant was that the age demographic of the viewership on the public broadcaster and SuperSport went down by about ten years – more young people were watching the cricket.”Despite his admission that he became a little cautious after reaching his fifty, Bavuma scored fluently after tea. Two fours off Stokes in consecutive overs (no lip, this time) were interspersed with two overs in which he took three runs each off Ali.Although England never faded, according to Bavuma, being cajoled by Jonny Bairstow and steered by Alastair Cook, it was punishingly hot in Cape Town, and they had been in the field since Sunday afternoon. A degree of drift was inevitable.While England’s thoughts would have slid towards the likelihood of having to bat again, Bavuma and Morris made merry. An over of ten runs for Morris off Moeen was matched by another productive over for Bavuma – now on 68 – off Stokes, including a two and two singles.As viewers began to realise the possibility of Bavuma reaching his ton, the sleepiness of the late-afternoon hours began to be replaced by a different feeling, something more hopeful, with a sharper edge. It was all South Africa, as the 550 mark was passed and 600 beckoned.Around 4pm, however, Bavuma found himself increasingly stretched. He was able to pinch the odd single, but Broad – who was brought back – shuttling himself across the breadth of the crease to subtly change the angle of delivery, had his number. “I was basically at his mercy,” says Bavuma. “He was troubling me because with the angle he was bowling, the ball was holding its line and you can be vulnerable to the outside edge. I was triggering towards him and pushing into his channel but he just kept on coming. When Alastair Cook asked him if he wanted another over during the spell and he said ‘No’, I was almost relieved.”Chris Morris supported Bavuma in a stand of 167•Getty ImagesLooking at the scorebook through this period and it’s a field of stubble – all dots and singles, singles and dots. For just over half an hour, from 3.45 to 4.17, Bavuma’s innings crept painfully along, with not a boundary in sight.The slow spell was broken by six in an over off Anderson but on 77 he snicked Broad low to Bairstow’s right; the ball died on the ‘keeper but hit his glove and the chance was fluffed. Buvuma knuckled down for a prolonged battle as he crept towards his hundred.Runs were now impossible to find, and Bavuma was stranded in the wilderness. None too confidently, he played out a maiden to Broad, and then five dots to Anderson. He was now on 84 and those precious 16 runs looked an awfully long way away. He scrambled here and there but for three overs he remained on 87; for four more he was stuck on 88. Then, just after 5pm, facing Moeen, the sweet relief of a boundary, his first in 48 minutes.When Morris departed, with Bavuma needing seven for his century, the thought of running out of partners crossed his mind when his franchise team-mate Kagiso Rabada walked in at 11 minutes past five.Rabada took guard and batted out the four remaining deliveries of Finn’s over, meaning Bavuma was on strike to Root. A dot ball was followed by a two. The third ball was safely negotiated (no run) and off the fourth, Bavuma squeezed a single to go to 96.Rabada, still on nought, batted out the over, meaning that Bavuma was on strike to Finn. At 5.19 he went to his century with a four. Minutes later Amla, in his penultimate day as the South Africa captain, declared the innings closed on 627 for 7. Few bothered to ask if South Africa had batted for too long.Bavuma has been making hundreds for six seasons now. His first first-class hundred – an unbeaten 152 – came for Gauteng against Easterns in Benoni in 2009-10, and the following season he made his debut franchise hundred, scoring 124 not out for Lions against Knights in Bloemfontein.In six seasons between 2004-05 and 2010-11, according to Andrew Samson, CSA’s official statistician, only six centuries were scored by black batsmen in South African first-class cricket – two of them by Bavuma – but off that small base, things have begun to change. Three were scored in 2011-12, one the following season, three the season after, six in 2014-15, and three last season. The net of those scoring hundreds has also widened. Since 2013-14, four batsmen other than Bavuma have scored first-class hundreds, including Omphile Ramela (4), Khaya Zondo (3), Thami Tsolekile (1) and Somila Seyibokwe (1).This suggests something approaching a virtuous circle, with Bavuma at its centre. It also tells us that, like the four-minute mile, which was thought of as an almost physical barrier, the art of the four-hour hundred is best understood in mental and not physical or technical terms. In breaking the hundred barrier – in South Africa’s 226th Test since readmission – Bavuma has beaten a path for others to follow, something which in time will be seen to be as precious as that elusive World Cup win.

New Zealand top order flattens Zimbabwe

ESPNcricinfo staff06-Aug-2016Martin Guptill (49) and Tom Latham (42) put on a century partnership and went to lunch unbeaten•AFPAfter the break, the Zimbabwe fans held a peaceful protest, holding their flags and singing the national anthem. Play was not interrupted at all•AFPGuptill was trapped lbw by Donald Tiripano, for 87, but Latham trudged along as Kane Williamson joined him•AFPThe Zimbabwe bowlers toiled without much reward as the second-wicket stand also grew alarmingly•AFPLatham brought up his second straight century and the fifth of his Test career, taking the team score past 250•AFPWilliamson, playing his 50th Test, was the most attacking of the three. He struck eight fours during the day and finished unbeaten on 95•AFPLatham handed a return catch to Sean Williams with two deliveries left for stumps, and walked back for 136. New Zealand ended the day on 329 for 2•AFP

'Being with the Indian team was like travelling with the Beatles'

Greg Chappell talks about captaining Australia, the WSC years, his finest innings, and coaching India

Interview by Crispin Andrews16-Aug-2016What would you say was the best atmosphere you ever played in?
The 1975 World Cup final and the Centenary Test were pretty special. I must admit, though, I really enjoyed my first tour of the Caribbean, in 1973. The atmosphere around the game, the love of the game, the lightness of attitude, the joy of the game.I loved touring England. I’d grown up dreaming of playing cricket in England and particularly representing Australia in England. But there was a very conservative air to the way cricket was played and viewed over there. In the Caribbean it was much more creative, relaxed and fun-loving. At that stage, they respected good cricket no matter who played it. On subsequent tours of the West Indies, when they started to do well, there was an expectation that West Indies would win. But in 1973 there was an air of joy about the cricket.What was the most difficult attack you played against?
It can be very demanding batting in Tests. Any Test attack is a good attack and can be hard to score runs against. I played against some good sides, but just for the sheer torture of batting against four quality pace bowlers, that West Indian side of the late 1970s and early 1980s was the most challenging.Do you think you would have beaten England in 1977 if the World Series Cricket (WSC) controversy wasn’t going on in the background?
Without the Packer thing, I think we would have lost anyway. That was a bit of a sideshow. Not having Dennis [Lillee] was a big blow. I think he would have bowled well over there. You’ve got to remember that Thommo [Jeff Thomson] was coming back from his shoulder injury and was probably only about 70% fit. We took the risk of taking him because we didn’t have Dennis. We thought that to go without either of them was going to be a bridge too far.What was the hardest thing about that series?
It was just a tough series. I don’t know that there was a lot we could have done to change it. I had implored the selectors to give us as much experience in batting as possible. Batting in England in those days was really tough. Very different from Australia. I think that’s changed a lot in the modern era with better drainage of grounds and methods of preparation. Wickets dry out much earlier in the season. Back then, right up until July, batting could be pretty tough. And we didn’t have a lot of batsmen with English experience in that series.

“There wasn’t a lot of money in the game, even after WSC. I was still making a lot more money off the field in business. I was starting to look to my future beyond cricket”

Why didn’t you go on the 1981 Ashes tour?
We had a young family, three young kids. I had business partners who’d been very generous in allowing me to play a lot of cricket in previous years. I felt I owed it to my family and to my business partners to spend some time at home. And I needed a break. I’d been playing cricket non-stop for quite a few years. I wanted to keep playing cricket. I’d toured everywhere except India and Pakistan by that stage. I’d been to England three times. There wasn’t a lot of money in the game, even after WSC. I was still making a lot more money off the field in business. I was starting to look to my future beyond cricket.You played mostly at home, after that?
I thought, if I’m going to keep playing, the place I enjoy playing most of all, is Australia. So from 1980 onwards, I decided to confine myself to playing at home as much as possible. When the opportunity came to tour Pakistan, I was glad to take that. Later on, when we had our first series against Sri Lanka, Kim Hughes wasn’t available for family reasons and I was prevailed upon to take that side away. It was a relatively short tour, so I was happy to do that.”Some of us were considered untouchable but some paid the penalty for defecting to Packer. That was a sad thing”•Fairfax Media via Getty ImagesWho was the better player, Viv or Barry Richards?
Too hard to split. Very different players, but both in their own way extremely talented. Viv could win a game in a session – he could take a game away from the opposition. But Barry was no slouch in that regard either.Strangest player you played with?
Greg Matthews came into the Australian side during my last season. He was just different to any other cricketer I played with. He came from a different background, spoke a different language, a surfie’s language. “Bro”, “cool” being a major part of his language. He didn’t meet the stereotype of what an Australian cricketer looked like, spoke like, sounded like. And yet he had a love of the game that was as strong as anyone I ever played with or against.And against?
Arkle [Derek Randall] was an interesting character. The first time I remember playing against him was in the Centenary Test. What an innings he played. But on the field he was perpetual motion. Talked gibberish, no one really knew what he was talking about. Extremely loveable character and a really nice fella.The best innings you ever played?
The Lord’s Test in 1972, just because of the conditions and the situation of the game [Chappell scored 131 out of 308 to give Australia a narrow first-innings lead]. Technically and mentally it was as good as I’d played. The conditions were very much in favour of the bowlers.

“Sixteen wickets on his Test debut was the worst thing that happened to Bob [Massie]. He felt the pressure, thought he had to take 16 wickets every time he bowled”

The 40-odd I got in the first innings of the Centenary Test was up there as well. Because that pitch was really difficult to bat on for the first day and a half. Australia got 138, England were all out for 95. It turned out to be one of the best batting wickets I played on, for the last three and a half days. By that time my two innings were over, so it didn’t matter much to me.Was it difficult coming back from World Series Cricket? Did you feel the establishment had it in for you?
It wasn’t that difficult for the senior players. It was tougher for the younger players or people who were struggling to get into the team or stay in it. A few suffered because they went to World Series Cricket. Some of us were considered untouchable but some paid the penalty for defecting to Packer. That was a sad thing. A few cricketers who could have and should have played a lot more Test cricket for Australia were compromised because of WSC.Who was the fastest, Jeff Thomson or Michael Holding?
Jeff Thomson by a considerable amount. Even Michael Holding admitted it. I remember someone asking him a similar question at a function and he said, we were all quick on our day and then there was Jeff Thomson.There was one other difference between Thommo and Michael. Michael, because of his classical action, you saw the ball the whole way. He put it out in front of you before, and as he delivered it. Thommo stuck it behind his back and you didn’t sight it until, all of a sudden, it appeared out of his hand.”It wasn’t an easy thing to be an Indian cricketer. I marvelled at the way they managed to absorb all of that [expectations]”•AFPWould you say that Australian team was at its peak from 1974 to 1976?
Yeah. Thomson and Lillee made the difference. They were a wonderful combination. I remember that cartoon: “Ashes to Ashes, dust to dust. If Thomson doesn’t get you, Lillee must.” When those two bowled, we were standing at slip expecting a catch every ball. It was phenomenal to be standing there watching those blokes bowl, knowing it was only a matter of time before the next catch would come.What happened to Bob Massie? With him at his best and those two quicks, Australia would have been unbeatable.
Sixteen wickets on his Test debut was the worst thing that happened to Bob. He felt the pressure, thought he had to take 16 wickets every time he bowled. And he started trying to really make it swing, whereas at Lord’s in that game, he just ran up, bowled, and it swung. At Trent Bridge on the 1972 tour there was another innings where he bowled beautifully.After that, he lost his swing, and once he lost his swing, he lost confidence and lost everything. We went to the West Indies in 1973 and they were pretty benign wickets. The ball was totally shagged after about 20 overs. He was trying to make it swing and it wouldn’t swing. He lost his rhythm. A little bit like a golfer who tries to change his swing to get a bit of extra distance and loses his timing and never gets it back. That was Bob, unfortunately.Was the Indian team you coached better than the Indian teams you played against?
The one that I coached had more depth in talent. There was a lot of talent in the teams we played against, in the top half a dozen players, but then it dropped away a bit. More from an experience and a belief point of view rather than a lack of talent.

“I would have loved to have coached an Australian team, if that had been available. But failing that, to get a chance to coach India was a great honour”

The Indian teams that I coached, on paper, had one of the best batting line-ups that any Test team could boast. Not many that outshone it as far as talent was concerned. The depth of talent in that group was extraordinary. I don’t know that they got the best out of the group that they had. Other teams probably got more out of the talent they had. There are a number of reasons for that. Partly because they didn’t have the bowling attack to make the most of that batting line-up. Away from India it didn’t do as well as it probably should have done.A lot has been said and written about the problems you had while coaching India. What was the most rewarding thing about your time coaching them?
It was a great honour to get a chance to coach someone else’s national team. I would have loved to have coached an Australian team, if that had been available. But failing that, to get a chance to coach India, which at the time was, and currently still is, the powerhouse in world cricket, and to have some of the great names that that line-up had was a great honour.Did you realise what you were getting yourself into when you took the job?
It was perhaps a little bit more complicated than anyone could have imagined. There were so many layers to life in India, let alone cricket. That was pretty hard to expect anyone to master, particularly an outsider.Being with the Indian cricket team was what it must have been like travelling with the Beatles. It was remarkable the way they were feted around the country wherever they went. Big crowds gathered at airports. The whole airport would come to a standstill.To see it from the inside and to understand some of the pressures on the players. It wasn’t an easy thing to be an Indian cricketer, especially a renowned Indian cricketer. The expectations, the interruptions to their day-to-day lives, and the restrictions on their ability to move freely – I marvelled at the way they managed to absorb all of that and just get on with it.

Tide begins to rise for West Indies pace unit

West Indies opened the four-Test series in Antigua with a not-so-fast bowling attack ground down by India’s batsmen, but the promising debuts of Miguel Cummins in Jamaica and Alzarri Joseph in St Lucia have them riding a new wave out of that early trough

Karthik Krishnaswamy in St Lucia 10-Aug-20162:46

Manjrekar: Very good selection moves from West Indies

A kicking, screaming short ball, too fast and too close to the batsman for a proper response. Was he cutting, punching, or defending? It seemed an awkward and only partially intentional combination of all three, and before he knew it Virat Kohli was gone, caught at first slip.Two genuine quicks sharing the new ball, another waiting to bowl. A fast, bouncy pitch, and a picturesque backdrop, in this case the Beausejour Hills with a manually operated scoreboard in front of it, saying 19 for 2. This, belatedly, was an echo of the West Indies that cricket fans have known and loved.Miguel Cummins had been in the squad since the first Test, but had only been part of their attack since the second. Alzarri Joseph had been in the squad since the second Test, but was only now making his debut, and was only now getting to bounce out India’s captain and best batsman. On the final day of the Sabina Park Test, West Indies had glimpsed a middle order with the potential to serve them for a long time. Now they were seeing, possibly, a pace attack take shape.Shannon Gabriel had struck first getting Shikhar Dhawan caught down the leg side, experiencing the stroke of luck his bowling has deserved all series. At the other end, Joseph gave the world a first glimpse – at senior level – of the effortless pace his lanky, loose-limbed frame could generate. He greeted Kohli with a bouncer that left him on his backside, foreshadowing the dismissal that was to come.Later, Cummins would come on and bowl just as quick, almost none of his pace coming from his shuffling run-up and almost all of it generated by the final thrust of shoulder and arm, and attack the throats of KL Rahul and Ajinkya Rahane. They popped three balls in the general direction of short leg. There was no fielder in place the first time, and the ball eluded him narrowly the next two times. India, playing with only five batsmen for the third time in the series – and on this occasion shuffling two of them out of position – were being seriously tested for the first time, from both ends, with little respite.It wasn’t all short and brutal. In the second session, West Indies’ seamers came out with an entirely different plan, and tested India’s patience in the corridor. Jason Holder, who has done this all series, was expected to bowl this way, but perhaps not Joseph in his first Test. He bowled eleven straight dot balls to Rohit Sharma after lunch, the bulk of them outside off stump, on a good length or just short of it, and bat came feeling for ball against the 12th ball, which straightened just enough to take the edge.West Indies had three genuine fast bowlers and a medium-paced fourth seamer, and all of them were doing their bit. They were bowling on the quickest surface of the series. Yet, by the end of the day, their busiest bowler was their offspinner, Roston Chase. At stumps, his figures read 23-8-38-2.Shortly before lunch, Chase had dismissed Rahul against the run of play. His best work, however, came between lunch and tea, when he sent down an eight-over spell that only cost his side nine runs and built enough frustration to pry out India’s last specialist batsman, Rahane.In that spell, Chase bowled quickish offbreaks on a stump-to-stump line, with the leg side heavily guarded. The six leg-side fielders were, typically, a short leg, a mid-on who would occasionally drop back to long-on, two midwickets – one straighter and close to the bat, the other squarer and slightly deeper – square leg and short fine leg. The only fielders on the off side were mid-off, extra cover and slip.Given the situation they were in, and Chase’s line, India couldn’t risk the sweep, particularly on a bouncy pitch with short fine leg waiting for the top edge. This allowed West Indies to suffocate India further with square leg saving the single rather than stationed on the boundary.Alzarri Joseph let loose with the short ball on debut and used it to claim Virat Kohli for his maiden Test wicket•AFPOf the 39 balls Chase bowled to Rahane and R Ashwin between lunch and tea, the batsmen played 20 into the leg side, for five runs, and 18 into the off side – 15 of them either towards mid-off or cover – for four runs. Chase hardly overpitched, and almost never dropped short enough to cut through the vacant region stretching from point to third man, or to pull over square leg.Something had to give and it was Rahane’s patience. Over the course of Chase’s spell, he had gone from 32 off 96 balls to 35 off 132. Out came the sweep, against a slow, loopy delivery that was a full toss if he hit it and a yorker if he missed. It was either the wrong ball for the sweep – its steep downward trajectory minimising the horizontal bat’s margin for error – or just poor execution. The ball dipped, eluded Rahane’s bat, and bowled him. India were 126 for 5.On a first-day pitch with little help for his offspin, Chase had done far more than anyone may have expected. He gave nothing away, bowled more overs than anyone else, and allowed the quicks to bowl shorter, sharper spells.West Indies may have found a group of promising fast bowlers, though no one at this stage would be silly enough to compare any of them to the greats of the 1980s. But they may just have unearthed a tall, restrictive offspinner not unlike Roger Harper. In the West Indies side he played for, Harper only needed to bowl around 15 overs an innings, but performed that task admirably, ending up as his team’s most economical bowler of the 80s while maintaining a sub-30 bowling average.On Tuesday’s evidence, Chase could do a similar job with the ball while offering far more with the bat. If West Indies build on the promise of their fast bowlers, they might yet assemble a consistently dangerous Test-match attack.

West Indies fail to cope with rampaging Yasir Shah

ESPNcricinfo staff25-Oct-2016But Chase added only three runs to his score, before being caught behind off Yasir Shah’s bowling•AFPBlackwood moved on swiftly to 95 off 127, in a knock that featured 11 fours…•Getty Images…until he was bowled by Yasir soon after the second new ball was taken•AFPYasir also dismissed Jason Holder in the morning session to pick up his eighth five-wicket haul and reduce West Indies to 266 for 7•Getty ImagesShai Hope, the last recognised batsman, fell 13 overs after lunch. Pakistan were two strikes away•Getty ImagesYasir picked up his sixth wicket, having Miguel Cummins was bowled•Getty ImagesAnd soon, Pakistan wrapped up a 133-run win and took an unassailable 2-0 lead…•AFP… which left their fans in Abu Dhabi quite delighted•Getty Images

Game
Register
Service
Bonus